AI Images Are NOW SCARY REALISTIC | | I was skeptical until I try this tool..

Remember when AI-generated images looked like abstract paintings gone wrong? Those days are officially behind us. The evolution of AI image generation has been remarkable, and what Flux 1.1 Ultra is delivering now might leave even the biggest skeptics stunned – and perhaps a little unnerved.

The New Reality of AI Images

Launched on November 6th, Flux 1.1 Ultra isn’t just another incremental update. It’s a quantum leap in AI image generation, offering two distinct models: Ultra and Raw. What makes this particularly interesting is how each model serves a different purpose:

Ultra Pro: Professional-grade, magazine-worthy edited photos

Raw: Natural, candid shots that mirror iPhone photography

The most impressive part? Generation time is just 10 seconds per image – a remarkable achievement in the field.

Why This Changes Everything

For those familiar with various AI image generators, what sets Flux apart is its uncanny ability to nail the details that typically give AI away. The technology excels at:

Perfect lighting and reflections

Consistent finger rendering (a historical pain point for AI)

Natural group dynamics in multi-person shots

Authentic environmental interactions

The implications are massive. Stock photography, wedding photography, and commercial shoots – all these industries stand on the brink of transformation.

Real-World Testing

Through extensive testing on the platform (which offers 20 free credits daily), both models demonstrate impressive capabilities:

Ultra Pro Test: With the prompt “24-year-old woman standing in a street with dark cloudy weather” The result: A photo worthy of a professional photoshoot – complete with perfect lighting, authentic weather effects, and believable urban elements.

Raw Version Test: The same prompt yielded completely different results The output perfectly mimicked an iPhone shot – natural, unpolished, and convincingly authentic.

Here Are Some Examples With Prompts:

Prompt: “selfie, 35-year-old man, at home, sitting in an armchair”

Aspect: “9:16”

Realism: “true”

Prompt:

“• Characters: A Mongol warrior, male, mid-30s, East Asian features, intense expression, with a traditional fur-lined helmet, scale armor in bronze and black tones, holding a bow. Mounted on a muscular, dark brown warhorse rearing slightly. • Environment: A foggy Hungarian plain at dawn, with faint outlines of distant hills. The ground is muddy with scattered puddles and grass. • Lighting: Soft dawn light with a cool, diffused blue-gray tone (color temperature 4500K), creating long, faint shadows. • Camera Specifications: Medium shot from a low angle, slightly tilted (Dutch angle) to evoke tension, 50mm focal length with shallow depth of field (f/2.8), blurring the horizon. • Artistic Direction: Hyperrealistic photography with cinematic drama. • Color Scheme: Muted earthy tones (#726A5A, #A39485) with accents of bronze and cool blue (#4A687A).”

Aspect: “9:16”

Realism: “true”

Prompt: “Fashion Foto: A young woman, simply dressed, her whole body is covered in traditional Māori tattoos, poses amidst the dazzling splendor of a luxurious department store. Around her hang designer clothes, expensive accessories gleaming in glass cases. Yet she herself is a contrast in her simple clothing. Her traditional body art feels out of place. Shot by David La Chappelle for Vogue. “

Aspect: “1:1”

Realism: “true”

Prompt: “Blonde with long wavy hair and red lipstick in a white t-shirt “Blondie” and pajama pants. Suburb, the lawn. 1987, 80s, sunset”

Aspect: “9:16”

Realism: “true”

The Game-Changing Features

Flux 1.1 Ultra stands out for its ability to:

Process complex, detailed prompts with remarkable accuracy

Maintain consistent quality across various scenarios

Generate convincing environmental elements without explicit prompting

Preserve realism in challenging scenarios like group shots and low-light conditions

The Reality Check

Here’s the sobering truth: These images have become nearly indistinguishable from real photos. Social media users attempting to spot AI-generated content often find themselves stumped, unable to differentiate between real and artificial imagery.

Looking Ahead

As 2024 progresses, this technology raises critical questions about:

The future of professional photography

The authenticity of digital content

Job market implications for creative professionals

The necessity of AI image detection tools

The Bottom Line

Whether society is prepared or not, AI image generation has crossed a significant threshold. Flux 1.1 Ultra isn’t merely another tool – it represents a glimpse into a future where the distinction between real and artificial imagery continues to blur.

The debate about AI’s capability to create realistic images is over. The new question facing society is how to adapt to a world where any image could be AI-generated.

While this technology shows impressive capabilities, responsible use and transparency regarding AI-generated content remain crucial. The future of digital imagery has arrived – how it shapes our world depends on how we choose to use it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous post Gamers using Windows 11 24H2 systems are getting jumpscared by this one weird audio bug
Next post Obsidian’s designers discuss how they decide the size of Avowed’s environments: ‘We don’t want to have those empty, meaningless spaces just to have them’